http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5714
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2012-12-02 06:34:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > So a final switch would only work on byte-types. I'm not sure if Walter > > would > > like a feature that only works with one fundamental type. > > There are also chars, and ubytes. They have the same range so it doesn't matter what you call them, the range is limited to 0 .. 255. > You can't have a default in static switches. Yes, you would use a normal switch for that. But you could have a helper template mixin that could error internally if you don't provide all the cases, which is a workaround for final switches not providing case ranges. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
