http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9112
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2012-12-07 10:59:34 PST --- > AFAIK, it's not exactly the same thing, as int(10) would be only a > constructor, so would not downcast. I agree, but if you look at Kenji's proposal, he specifically says that there's a cast involved (which I'd missed when I read it the first time). So, Andrej's complaint is completely valid given Kenji's initial proposal. But if you fix it so that no cast is involved, then I think that it's fine. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
