http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> 2012-12-21 06:37:34 PST --- @bear: Please see the comments here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1017 The feature can be implemented but to!() was rejected, so we need to come up with some alternative function names and put them somewhere other than std.conv. Personally I don't see how people will be expected to find an obscure function name like 'codePointIdx'. This isn't related unicode representation at all, there should be no confusion with Unicode when it comes to representing 0-9, it's always the same regardless of encoding. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
