http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5508
Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2013-01-08 09:51:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Not sure I get the semantics. Currently the assertion fails because the > > first > > array does not start with any of the other arrays. Please advise. > > The array starts with \r\n which is the second element in the second array. I understand. But that conflicts with the current semantics, which say that for x and y of type T[], x.startsWith(y) is true iff y is a prefix of x. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
