http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9292
Iain Buclaw <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <[email protected]> 2013-01-10 12:44:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created an attachment (id=1178) [details] > test case > > When compiling testcase.d, hasNestedArgs returns these results: > > topNIndex!() nested=0 > Test!(indirectLess) nested=1 > BinaryHeap!(Test()) nested=0 > > AFAIK BinaryHeap!(Test()) should also be marked as nested, as it needs > Test!(indirectLess) which is nested? > > I'm not sure if this causes a real problem in dmd, but we use > hasNestedArgs/isnested in gdc to tell the backend if the instantiated template > is accessible from other modules. > > Therefore this test case currently ICEs gdc (also depends on gcc version. Some > are more picky) > > BTW: Would it be OK to mark this as "blocker", as it blocks gdc from compiling > that test case? IIRC, the way DMD does it, all functions are public, even nested ones. I think I've had this argument before with Alex over whether I should follow suit or carry on marking nested functions as non-public. Call by alias is meant to be a direct call that skips any checks for where the function actually is. So far have been special casing these instances as I find them. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
