http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
--- Comment #10 from [email protected] 2013-01-11 01:54:52 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > I simply don't see any need to refer to a function anonymously when making a > recursive call. You can just use its name like you do anywhere else that you > call it. The _only_ advantage that I see is that you have fewer lines of code > to change when you change the function's name, but search and replace takes > care of that quite easily. Do you mean you wish/prefer to write OOP like this in D? class Foo { Foo(int x) {...} void bar(Foo f) { Foo g = new Foo(5); ... } } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
