http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8441
--- Comment #6 from [email protected] 2013-01-18 09:49:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > > But the instantiation of a signal and the access: > mixin T!("1") t0; > alias t0 t1; > x.f1().j!(3,"a")(2.2, 3.3); > > vs > mixin T!() t0; > x.t0.j!(3,"a")(2.2, 3.3); > > would change, which is part of the public accessible API. If the > workaround gets removed, people would have to adopt their code, which is > kind of unacceptable for phobos. > > Best regards, > > Robert I don't understand. You used to have: mixin T!("1") t0; alias t0 t1; x.f1().j!(3,"a")(2.2, 3.3); And I proposed something that worked with mixin T!("1") t0; alias t0 t1; x.f1().j!(3,"a")(2.2, 3.3); Nothing changed. Where did: mixin T!() t0; x.t0.j!(3,"a")(2.2, 3.3); Come from? All you should need is a private "man in the middle"... Well, I don't have your end code, so I don't know how acceptable that is anyways. Good luck :) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
