http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9423
Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2013-01-29 09:23:54 PST --- When I fixed bug7705, I decided that lambda inference does not infer parameter storage classes. Instead, users should specify `ref`/`out`/`lazy` explicitly. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/809/files#L1R496 Because, explicit specifying of `ref` in call site is sometimes required in newsgroup. void foo(ref int x) {} int n; foo(ref n); // not allowed in today So, current behavior is intended. You should write it as follows: void foo(int delegate(ref int[1]) spam) {} void main() { foo((ref x) => 0); // OK } However, I cannot say clearly whether it's right behavior. I think that the opinion "parameter storage classes should be inferred" is also worth. Therefore, I'll mark this as 'enhancement'. ===== A pull to implement this feature: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1580 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------