http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5036
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Sowiński <[email protected]> 2013-02-26 12:28:04 PST --- The argument was the least about consistency, I recall caching got in the way when the mapped to element was: - used <= 1 times - trivial to calculate (faster than read/write) - manually allocated (harder to anticipate destruction) Plus, front/back vs. opIndex poses problems of their own. Why the obligation to cache? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
