http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
--- Comment #18 from [email protected] 2013-03-01 03:15:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #17) > > template type parameter deduction without specialization always be > > MATCHconvert > > AFAIK this is a kludgy implementation detail It is a bug. > to make specialization work. Why wouldn't they work otherwise? > The > last time we worked on that we concluded (with Daniel Murphy?) that there > should be an additional level between convert and exact. I don't remember the > details right now, but I'll try to find the relevant discussion. There already is a level between them (conversion to const.) Anyway, I do not see why another level would be required, or even helpful in any way. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
