http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9621
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Olshansky <[email protected]> 2013-03-01 04:33:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Something I'm going to change. Technically there is no reason to pull these > > tables. Also in case of parse the cost to benefit is far > > I've meant lower, obviously. Looks like I'm on streak... for std.conv.parse it's *higher* cost to benefit ratio after all. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
