http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7177
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2013-03-21 09:22:30 PDT --- > I don't think we need to require opDollar with hasSlicing, why would you think > that? Because if you don't, then you can never use $ when slicing a range. And really, isRandomAccessRange should require that $ work with finite ranges for the same reason. As it stands, you pretty much can't use $ in generic code. It's only good for arrays, because you can't count on it working for anything else. The appropriate range templates must be able to require them for us to be able to use them, and if we change them to require opDollar without this enhancement request, then it's going to break a lot of code. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
