http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9771
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2013-03-22 19:28:25 PDT --- I wouldn't go as far as using introspection to make a default toHash, but I think there's value in providing a default toHash for classes that just hashes the object's address (I think that's what the current toHash does). But if we're going to be forcing users to manually define opEquals and toHash, then we should make rt.util.hash available to user code. The only thing worse than having a wrong default opEquals/toHash is a morass of duplicated user code implementing poorly-designed hashing algorithms for each user-defined type. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
