http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7177
--- Comment #67 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2013-04-02 07:47:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > (In reply to comment #65) > > BTW disabling opDollar should mean "pass through". Consider: > > I think it would introduce one more "special case" in operator overloading > mechanism. I hate special rules. > > > > As far as I understand it, his proposal is to restrict $ to ranges. > > > > > > auto ref opDollar(R)(auto ref R r) if (isInputRange!R && hasLength!R) > > > { > > > return r.length; > > > } > > > > > > std.range vs. object.d is a separate issue. > > > > Is that correct, Kenji? (I don't think we should mix ranges into this > > without > > necessity.) > > Yes. It is correct. See my experimental implementation. I agree this is a good counter-argument to my proposed approach. > > https://github.com/9rnsr/dmd/branches/fix7177alt > > https://github.com/9rnsr/phobos/branches/fix7177alt > > https://github.com/9rnsr/phobos/commit/dd0d4c139828013c34e76acc74884341f31db298#L0R1326 I think this is a good compromise. Unless there are other issues found by others, I agree moving forward with this. More thoughts? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
