http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9857
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] 2013-04-02 10:11:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > That seems like a stretch.. why would you need this? 1) I am using UFCS often in D, for functions, higher order functions, etc. A struct with an opCall method is usable like a function with state. So for uniformity with the other functions I'd like to use it with UFCS. When you have a long UFCS chain you don't want to break it, if it's possible. 2) Both struct constructors, struct implicit constructors and struct static opCall support UFCS, so I don't see a good reason for the normal struct opCall to not support it: struct Foo { static int opCall(int x) { return x * 2; } } struct Bar { int x; this(int y) { x = y * 2; } } struct Spam { int x; } void main() { assert(10.Foo == 20); assert(10.Bar.x == 20); assert(10.Spam.x == 10); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
