http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9882
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2013-04-05 11:52:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sure, but I prefer the lambda syntax: > > .tap!(s => writeln(s)) A lambda like s => writeln(s) returns void, it's kind of the opposite of the lambda calculus :-) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
