http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4565
Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> 2013-05-31 10:33:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I think this is not a bad program. > > int[1][3] a1 = [1, 2, 3]; > is same as: > > int[1][3] a1 = void; > a1[0][] = 1; // fill all elements by 1 > a1[1][] = 2; // fill all elements by 2 > a1[2][] = 3; // fill all elements by 3 > > Then a1 is initialized by [[1], [2], [3]]. > > And it is consistent with: > int[3] sa = 1; // sa is initialized to [1, 1, 1] FWIW I agree with bearophile here. In the case of having a single value on the RHS it is easy (?) to construe how int[3] a = 1 (or even maybe int[3][3] a = 1) would initialize all the elements, but when you specify an array literal on the RHS, I think it should have the same shape as the array specified in the type on the LHS to avoid hard-to-find bugs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
