http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4136
Michal Minich <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Michal Minich <[email protected]> 2013-06-18 04:20:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > I don't understand well the design of @disable, but to be useful and more > meaningful isn't it necessary/better to enforce it (at run-time) on the > dynamic > type of an object? @disable is exactly for static enforcement, so it can work on statically know type of variable (not dynamic instance type). Dynamic enforcement is available via "override void foo() { assert(false) };". So I think this bug is invalid. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
