http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10427
Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2013-06-20 14:21:02 PDT --- How is this a bug? It doesn't _need_ an opEquals, so it would be bad practice to add one. If it's changed to a reference type, _then_ you need opEquals, and you implement it. But until it's a reference type, opEquals is unnnecessary, and not having it is most definitely not a bug. If anything, the fact that XOrshiftEngine and LinearCongruentialEngine have opEquals have opEquals is the bug. As far as I can tell, they don't need them. Please _don't_ declare opEquals on types that don't need them. It _increases_ the chances of there being a bug, because the opEquals could be wrong. It could also be less efficient than what the compiler would have done on its own. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
