http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9498
--- Comment #8 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2013-06-30 16:49:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Than you should read again if you don't see the relevance. Function returning > AA value as discussed here is a case which should throw according to TDPL > (spec > is silent unfortunately) and current D implementation in case of non-ref > functions. Presence of ref attribute does not matter because function performs > read operation in the first place. How value is returned (by ref or not) is of > secondary importance. TDPL is not an authoritative specification, so the fact this is in line with the way TDPL presents AAs does not conclusively prove this is correct behavior. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
