http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10527
--- Comment #1 from Tommi <[email protected]> 2013-07-03 04:12:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > [..] the language should guarantee these two things: > 1) cpy's postblit constructor is omitted when cpy is constructed > 2) cpy's destructor is omitted when cpy goes out of scope Let's change this proposal so that the language would guarantee to do those optimisations only when it can deduce that it can be done from looking at function signatures. And the compiler can choose whether or not it wants to try to do more postblit/destructor elisions through static analysis. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
