http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7364
Tommi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Tommi <[email protected]> 2013-07-06 08:36:27 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Any solution should be able to replace the existing syntax completely, so the > compiler would have to parse e.g. function template blocks: > > template initOf(T) > { > T this() > {return T.init;} > } > > I think instead of using 'this' for the symbol name, 'template' would be > clearer. I think using 'out' as the symbol name would be even clearer. But I agree that 'template' is better than 'this'. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
