http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10701
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] 2013-07-23 05:04:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Reduced: > [...] > Removing appender makes bug go away. Nice. Appender in itself isn't doing anything much. As long as an allocation occurs, any function will do: //---- string toStr(long src) { new int; return ""; } //---- EG: //---- import core.memory; extern(C) int printf(const char*, ...); void readt() { //ubyte[] result = new ubyte[](5000); //This works ubyte[] result; result.length = 5000; //But this fails GC.free(result.ptr); result = null; } string toStr(long src) { new int; return ""; } void main() { foreach(int i; 0 .. 1024) { printf("Step: %d\n", i); string corruptme = "./temp"; foreach(e; 0 .. 256) { corruptme ~= toStr(1); } readt(); } } //---- This still preserves the "This works/But this fails" issue. Cores on iteration 255 (adding more "new int" will divide that number by the amount of "new") -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
