http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5325
--- Comment #3 from Michel Fortin <[email protected]> 2013-07-24 08:22:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > How about making a distinction between const(Object) and const Object? > I think it would be less intrusive and more in line with the const(void)* vs. > const void* behavior. That'll only work in the context where you're declaring a tail-const variable of type Object. If you're declaring an array of tail-const objects, or passing a tail-const object as a template parameter, you can't omit the parenthesis. But the ref postfix works: const(Object)ref[] arrayOfTailConstObjects; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
