http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10712
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2013-07-25 04:11:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Dupe of Issue 4085 ? Looks like it. I also like the name "Iota!(0, 10, 2)": Imediatly clear. > > Arguably, iota accepts "iota(10)", but I (and others) think that is a > > retarded > > idea, when typing "iota(0, 10)", is just and easy. I think we should avoid > > making the same mistakes. > > I requested that to Andrei. And I still think it's a good idea, it comes from > Python iterations: > > >>> range(10) > [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] > > Discussing iota(10) is off topic here, but if you want you can explain here or > in D.learn. I think I remember a thread about this. But if there is existing reasons for doing it that way, I'm not going to go against it. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > >>> range(10) > > [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] > > > > Discussing iota(10) is off topic here, but if you want you can explain here > > or > > in D.learn. > > In D the single argument iota allows you to write UFCS chains like: > > ....reduce!(...).iota.... That's a good point. Closing as dup. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4085 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
