http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10810
Henning Pohl <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #4 from Henning Pohl <[email protected]> 2013-08-12 19:20:42 PDT --- > The D programs that compile after the fix that wouldn't have compiled > before. I just wondered what DMD would do when I throw this at it. Of course those return type depencies can get awfully complex and can involve tons of functions. > Indeed, but in order to fix this issue, we need a computationally decidable > notion of dependence of function return types. And it will be hard to get this implemented. The current behavior is neither surprising nor dangerous. De facto no one will encounter this bug so I will lower the importance to minor. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
