http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7432
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Fomin <[email protected]> 2013-08-18 21:48:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Yes, that was the essence of bug 3118. It seems Walter wontfix'd it because > he > feels each attribute needs to be considered individually. > > The only explanation of pure that I've managed to find in the specs relates to > functions. > http://dlang.org/function.html#pure-functions > > In the absence of any explanation of what pure means applied to variables, I > can only be assumed that pure cannot be applied to variables, and therefore > any > attempt to apply pure to a variable is supposed to fail with a compile error. This is not a good way of reasoning. Also, as described above there are cases like in attribute: or attribute {} where ignoring storage class helps. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
