http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10848
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2013-08-19 20:47:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Sounds like a good case for a __forceinline attribute, and then apply it > implicitly in this case. This situation could leverage the same internal > mechanic. "forceinline" is misleading word. This proposal *does not* guarantee that the generated code is always inlined. If the given lambda body is too large/complex, or compiler's inlining ability is very little, the generated code may not be inlined. The language spec should allow it. > I still have MANY places where I want to guarantee inlining of certain > functions. Inlining would increase compilation time. Such places should be defined carefully. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------