http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10881
--- Comment #6 from [email protected] 2013-08-24 19:44:30 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > because the format spec > is just propagated to the real/imaginary parts of the number. This is > unexpected because from the user's POV, the field width specifies the width > for > the entire complex number, not the individual parts. In my request I wrote: > (here 3.2f is used for both parts of the complex number): I meant that each single floating point value is formatted independently with 3.2f. This means my POV was different from the one you have assumed. I don't know what's the best solution for this, but I think my request is simpler, just format the two values separately, this means calling and re-using the usual floating point formatting logic two times. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
