http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9816
--- Comment #10 from Martin Nowak <[email protected]> 2013-08-29 07:49:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > A few random comments: > > - I think in a situation where you want to use the same code for static and > dynamic linking, "export" is not usable. I'd propose to export every public > symbol at module granularity depending on a compile switch. I'm not a big of conflating protection and export. For example you could split a library in two DLLs in which case you might need to export/import private and package protected symbols. > - but then, there is no easy way to tell whether symbols in a module are > imported from a static or dynamic library. This distinction is necessary > though, as the code is different for both situations. Can you tell a bit more about this. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
