http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10434
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> 2013-08-30 03:02:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > +1 for RandGen, self-documenting and doesn't clash with existing symbol. Rng > is > a bit obscure for those not in the know. If you look at the pull which has just landed, I settled on UniformRNG in order to match the isUniformRNG template, with RandomGen as a secondary choice. I decided this was preferable since the uniformity of the generator _does_ matter. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
