http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10920
--- Comment #5 from Dicebot <pub...@dicebot.lv> 2013-09-24 19:01:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I think it was already discussed in that Walters pull request and rejected > > as > > invalid. If `foo.d` imports `bar.d` it MUST also compile `bar.d` too and > > link > > into the final application. > > My question and Walter's reply: > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2550#issuecomment-24296228 > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2550#issuecomment-24297212 > > But I still worries that the current design is difficult to understand. Yeah, that is exactly the comments I was referring to, thanks. And I completely agree with Walter here - this is difficult to understand only if you think about modules in a similar way as C headers, but those are not. Average programmer should care about internal design as much as he cares about exact optimization algorithms in backend. Omitting some modules during compilation is illegal and likely to break the program in some way (not only current one), that should be told explicitly in spec if it is not already. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
