http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10979
Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> 2013-10-08 14:07:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Anyway this will likely need a lot more thought and discussion before an > implementation is even considered. E.g. the first problem I can think of, is > what happens when a function in the graph is private? Can we still call > __traits on it? It probably warrants a NG discussion. Reflection normally bypasses visibility restrictions such as private. Maybe I just haven't paid enough attention, but I've never seen a case in any language where privates were hidden from reflection. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
