http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7725
Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2013-10-10 06:51:09 PDT --- Another test-case copied from http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11207#c0: (In reply to comment #0) > class A {} > class B : A {} > B foo(const A) { return null; } > void main() { > A function(const A) f1 = &foo; // compiles > B function(A) f2 = &foo; // does not compile > B function(immutable A) f3 = &foo; // does not compile > B function(B) f4 = &foo; // does not compile > } > > test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (& foo) of type B > function(const(A) _param_0) to B function(A) > test.d(7): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (& foo) of type B > function(const(A) _param_0) to B function(immutable(A)) > test.d(8): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (& foo) of type B > function(const(A) _param_0) to B function(B) > > > These implicit conversions should be possible. Explicit casting is too > confusing and dangerous. If you make a mistake, you will end up with serious > runtime errors. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
