http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11282
--- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts <[email protected]> 2013-10-16 16:34:59 PDT --- Right. I'm familiar with the problem space. The issue, which python chooses to make it the users problem, and only really visible in docs, if they happen to see it: Note: The data read is buffered in memory, so do not use this method if the data size is large or unlimited. That's a bit more cavalier than I prefer in our standard library. If we require both the input range and the output sink to be supplied, then that puts the choice front and center to the api and not an implementation detail to leave as buyer beware. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
