http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
--- Comment #5 from safety0ff.bugz <[email protected]> 2013-10-21 12:20:33 PDT --- As you can see in the first screen shot, the address for s41 is calculated properly, whereas in the second screenshot the is a mistake. rip for the printf calculation: 0x419c84 rip for the assert calculation: 0x419c99 difference: 0x15 offset for the printf calculation: 0x21e35c offset for the assert calculation: 0x21e344 difference: 0x18 Looking at the relocation section of the executable, printf seems to be giving the correct location (0x63cdd0.) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
