https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11322
yebblies <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |11317 --- Comment #2 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2013-11-15 00:39:48 EST --- For analyze, the inliner generates (b ? i : i)++; and because the results of the inliner are never run through semantic, it never gets converted to the lvalue version (*(b ? &i : &i))++; This is an inliner bug... The way the inliner interacts with ref is not great. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
