https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10714
yebblies <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2013-11-19 04:09:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > The problem with making it an intrinsic again is that doing so would break > some > code that relies on bt being executable at compile time. It is quite possible to have an intrinsic that is executable at compile time... It's even possible for a function to both have a body _and_ be an intrinsic. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
