https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-21 03:19:53 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I like the reverse vs. reversed idea from Python. Leave reverse as-is and > provide reversed that only returns a new result (no side effects on backing > sequence). That way I won't have to do .dup in my example. Win-win. I prefer reverse() to just return the range despite its uncleanness, or reverse().release to return it. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------