https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8845
--- Comment #12 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2013-11-27 23:47:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > I don't think there is. That would have been far too sensible :) > > > > Well, if you can remember where the discussion and agreement was, it might > > be a > > good idea to make one and link it. > > IIRC, it was actually you that proposed the winning deprecation path. > It was comparable to the introduction of mandatory override. I think you > suggested one version introduces a deprecation warning where override is > stated > but virtual is not present on the base, then the next version enforces it. I eventually realized that override implies virtual, and therefore only the introducing methods need to be modified. Up until that point I was pretty skeptical. I've created an enhancement for it: issue 11616 Feel free to CC yourselves if you're interested. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
