https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2013-12-27 16:27:23 PST --- @9999 Yes, any changes to std.datetime will cause me more merge problems in finishing splitting std.datetime, but if any changes actually need to get in (e.g. a bug fix), then they should be merged (and then I'll just have to deal with the merge conflicts), particularly since I've been swamped at work for the past few months and unable to finish splitting std.datetime (I'm in the middle of reworking the documentation at this point). Right now, I'm expecting to get back to D stuff towards the beginning of February, but I'm effectively a road block until then with regards to any std.datetime changes which rely on me, and while I'd prefer that more changes not be made to std.datetime in the interim and cause me more work, if they need to be done, they need to be done. But I would appreciate it if trivial stuff didn't get changed as it will create more work for me. I'll make sure that all such warnings are fixed as I rework the documentation, but if anyone feels like they need to be fixed before that, then they can create a pull request for it. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
