https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11863
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2014-01-05 00:29:47 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hmm, with "-allinst" switch, OP code runs successfully in Windows (Both -m32 > and -m64). Instead of "-allinst", "-release" also suppresses the error. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Hmm, with "-allinst" switch, OP code runs successfully in Windows (Both -m32 > > and -m64). > > I *thought* I had tried that, but I must have gotten it wrong. I can confirm > it > works too for linux64. > > So... is this an actual bug? > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11284 > Seems to indicate the problem would come from a "build irregularity"? Does > this > mean there is a Phobos build irregularity? I'm not sure, but essentially I think "build irregularity" should not be there. If it exists, it is a fault of separate compilation feature. Current template instantiation strategy is fragile. Walter's implementation is often does not fully cover target cases when it is introduced... -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------