https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
yebblies <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #9 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2014-01-09 01:03:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > int 3 might be a better choice, even in kernel mode that's a debugging trap, > and it is also a one byte instruction on x86 (0xCC). I'd say either do that or > continue to generate a call to a runtime function, but just use _d_assert > without the moduleinfo argument instead of _d_assertm. > I think still calling _d_assertm is a good idea. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
