https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #31 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2014-01-20 16:39:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #24) > A recent note by Walter: > > > Andrei's right. This is not about making it right-associative. It is about > > defining in the language that: > > > > ((a ~ b) ~ c) > > > > is guaranteed to produce the same result as: > > > > (a ~ (b ~ c)) You mean by doing away with concatenation of an array type with its element type altogether? That would be overly restrictive. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
