https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11823
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2014-02-01 06:37:33 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I'm not sure this is the right approach. An alternative is to recognize > > __FILE__, etc., as special. > > Well according to the spec compiler-reserved symbols start with double > underscores, so I picked that approach. I guess we could instead implement an > isBuiltinSymbol check? Even if double-underscored symbols are reserved in language spec, users can use them in their own own responsibility. (currently dmd does not reject defining such names). Therefore I think isBuiltinSymbol check would be better, because it is more conservative way. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
