https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] 2014-02-07 11:24:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > I think traces could probably be done lazily. A pointer to the stack top is > available on throw, and all the code executed from that point should be above > that, so the stack should be preserved. It's worth a shot. But wouldn't that be trashed by the stack unwinding? I mean, if a catch block makes function calls before looking at the trace, wouldn't that scramble what was there? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
