https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12120
--- Comment #5 from Puneet Goel <[email protected]> 2014-02-09 18:25:16 PST --- > static Foo opCall() > { > Foo foo; > foo.bar = ...; > return foo; > } Thanks Vladimir. Kenji the idea that this syntax "Foo foo = Foo();" would not be supported if another constructor is available is a bit too constraining. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
