https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
--- Comment #8 from [email protected] 2014-02-15 23:28:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #7)> > However, I'm not sure what you expect to happen here. Rebindable has supported > arrays for several years now. We can't just remove it. > > Removing it would making Rebindable a little more simple, and allows us to > remove a few lines of code, but are there any other benefits? Is it worth > potentially breaking someone's code, or introducing a slow deprecation > process? I don't know what I expect to happen, nor what the best solution is, but there *is* something odd here, and that's why I filed the issue. As I said, it goes against what documentation says. I also find it *very* inconsistent that arrays are accepted, but not pointers nor AA's. Especially pointers, which are the closest things to classes. *I*'d introduce a "slow" deprecation process. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
