https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12153
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2014-02-19 02:31:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sure it is. If instead of converting `a = b` (where lhs is a static array) > into `a[] = b[]` the compiler left the lhs intact as a static array, then > converting the condexp to an lvalue would have resulted in `*(b ? &i : &j) = > [4]` and this bug would not have occurred. But in the cond exp, both i and j are already lvalue. So translating lvalue (b ? i : j) to lvalue *(b ? &i : &j) is redundant in front-end layer and will never occur. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
