https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #11 from [email protected] 2014-02-19 14:53:47 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > How about "fold" instead, that's the classical functional programming name for > that. Also there is foldl and foldr in Haskell. Took a quick look at the doc, and I like what I see. I'm convinced with fold. It also has documented variants, which we could also implement. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
